The entire book, the characters are living in "fear" from them. It doesn't touch on anything from the point of view of the Natives. The only mentions of Natives in this book are how they are merely an obstacle that the pioneers had to "overcome" so they could (and this is an actual quote) "build a community based on ideals that would come to define our country". These commenters are very much in denial or didn't read the book. A opinion that feels EXTREMELY Revisionist to me. Almost like a book that a Publisher completed after the author had passed away.īack to your question after that context, the book very much DOES have an opinion. The book honestly feels like it was cobbled together from rough drafts or pages of information/letters that haven't been sculpted into a book. I think with how short it is, and how it lacks a constant writing style. The book (imo) fails as a purely historical record, as the other 3 state it is. The book is completely based off the real letters and diaries from 5 people who were actual pioneers that settled in Ohio and the midwest. The book is completely based off the real letters and diaries from 5 people who were actual pion …more Id argue that these answers are not entirely correct. Josh Id argue that these answers are not entirely correct.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |